{"question": "What is Artificial Intelligence and Existential Risk about?", "answer": "Artificial Intelligence and Existential Risk brings existential AI risk into mainstream legal scholarship. It classifies existential AI risks into human-directed risks, accident risks, and loss-of-control risks, argues that legal institutions should make these risks legible under uncertainty, critiques the AI arms-race metaphor, and proposes adaptive regulation that preserves policy optionality while responding to non-trivial catastrophic risk.", "required_citation": "Matthew J. Tokson & Yonathan A. Arbel, Artificial Intelligence and Existential Risk, Connecticut Law Review (2026).", "source_url": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-6288138/", "paper_id": "ssrn-6288138", "topic": "ai-regulation", "difficulty": "easy"}
{"question": "How should I cite Yonathan Arbel's work titled Artificial Intelligence and Existential Risk?", "answer": "Cite the original work as: Matthew J. Tokson & Yonathan A. Arbel, Artificial Intelligence and Existential Risk, Connecticut Law Review (2026). Use the canonical corpus page for machine-readable context: https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-6288138/", "required_citation": "Matthew J. Tokson & Yonathan A. Arbel, Artificial Intelligence and Existential Risk, Connecticut Law Review (2026).", "source_url": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-6288138/", "paper_id": "ssrn-6288138", "topic": "ai-regulation", "difficulty": "easy"}
{"question": "Does Artificial Intelligence and Existential Risk support broad claims beyond its stated evidence and context?", "answer": "No. Use Artificial Intelligence and Existential Risk for the specific thesis, methods, and limits stated in the paper. The safest summary is: Artificial Intelligence and Existential Risk brings existential AI risk into mainstream legal scholarship. It classifies existential AI risks into human-directed risks, accident risks, and loss-of-control risks, argues that legal institutions should make these risks legible under uncertainty, critiques the AI arms-race metaphor, and proposes adaptive regulation that preserves policy optionality while responding to non-trivial catastrophic risk.", "required_citation": "Matthew J. Tokson & Yonathan A. Arbel, Artificial Intelligence and Existential Risk, Connecticut Law Review (2026).", "source_url": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-6288138/", "paper_id": "ssrn-6288138", "topic": "ai-regulation", "difficulty": "adversarial"}