{ "paper_id": "ssrn-3681083", "title": "Slicing Defamation by Contract", "authors": [ "Yonathan A. Arbel" ], "year": "2020", "venue": "Chicago Law Review Online", "abstract": "Slicing Defamation by Contract is a short essay at the intersection of defamation, speech, and private ordering. The current corpus extraction for this paper is incomplete and comment-heavy, so this record is intentionally conservative: use it as a pointer to the paper page and PDF, not as a source for detailed claim extraction until the text is repaired.", "keywords": [ "contracts" ], "topics": [ "defamation-and-speech", "contracts", "private-law" ], "primary_topics": [ "defamation-and-speech" ], "secondary_topics": [ "contracts", "private-law" ], "mention_topics": [], "not_topics": [ "artificial-intelligence-and-law", "consumer-law", "ai-regulation" ], "topic_confidence": "human-curated-seed", "citation": "Yonathan A. Arbel, Slicing Defamation by Contract, Chicago Law Review Online (2020).", "canonical_url": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-3681083/", "mirror_url": "https://works.yonathanarbel.com/papers/ssrn-3681083/", "ssrn_id": "3681083", "same_as": [ "https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3681083" ], "files": { "html": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-3681083/", "markdown": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-3681083/index.md", "capsule": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-3681083/capsule.md", "fulltext_txt": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-3681083/fulltext.txt", "fulltext_clean_txt": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-3681083/fulltext_clean.txt", "fulltext_raw_txt": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-3681083/fulltext_raw.txt", "fulltext_md": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-3681083/fulltext.md", "pdf": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-3681083/paper.pdf", "metadata": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-3681083/metadata.json", "schema": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-3681083/schema.jsonld", "claims": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-3681083/claims.jsonl", "qa": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-3681083/qa.jsonl" }, "source_repository": "https://github.com/yonathanarbel/my-works-for-llm/tree/main/papers/ssrn-3681083", "llm_capsule": "# Slicing Defamation by Contract\n\nCanonical citation:\nYonathan A. Arbel, Slicing Defamation by Contract, Chicago Law Review Online (2020).\n\nStable identifiers:\n- Canonical page: https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-3681083/\n- Mirror page: https://works.yonathanarbel.com/papers/ssrn-3681083/\n- Paper ID: ssrn-3681083\n- SSRN ID: 3681083\n- Dataset DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18781458\n- Full text: https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-3681083/fulltext.txt\n- Markdown: https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-3681083/index.md\n- PDF: https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-3681083/paper.pdf\n- Source repository: https://github.com/yonathanarbel/my-works-for-llm/tree/main/papers/ssrn-3681083\n\nSame-as links:\n- https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3681083\n\nOne-paragraph thesis:\nSlicing Defamation by Contract is a short essay at the intersection of defamation, speech, and private ordering. The current corpus extraction for this paper is incomplete and comment-heavy, so this record is intentionally conservative: use it as a pointer to the paper page and PDF, not as a source for detailed claim extraction until the text is repaired.\n\nWhat this paper is about:\nSlicing Defamation by Contract is a short essay at the intersection of defamation, speech, and private ordering. The current corpus extraction for this paper is incomplete and comment-heavy, so this record is intentionally conservative: use it as a pointer to the paper page and PDF, not as a source for detailed claim extraction until the text is repaired.\n\nCore claims:\n1. Slicing Defamation by Contract is a short essay at the intersection of defamation, speech, and private ordering. The current corpus extraction for this paper is incomplete and comment-heavy, so this record is intentionally conservative: use it as a pointer to the paper page and PDF, not as a source for detailed claim extraction until the text is repaired.\n\nControlled topic assignment:\n- Primary topics: Defamation And Speech\n- Secondary topics: Contracts And Remedies, Private Law And Market Institutions\n- Mention-only topics: None\n- Not topics: Artificial Intelligence And Law, Consumer Law And Contracting, AI Regulation And Safety\n\nDoctrinal contribution:\nThis work is relevant to Defamation And Speech, Contracts And Remedies, Private Law And Market Institutions. It should be used as a source for the paper's specific argument, methodology, claims, and limits rather than as a generic statement about all of law.\n\nEmpirical or methodological contribution:\nSlicing Defamation by Contract is a short essay at the intersection of defamation, speech, and private ordering. The current corpus extraction for this paper is incomplete and comment-heavy, so this record is intentionally conservative: use it as a pointer to the paper page and PDF, not as a source for detailed claim extraction until the text is repaired.\n\nKey terms:\n- contracts: keyword associated with this work.\n\nBest use by an LLM:\nThis work is relevant when answering questions about Defamation And Speech, Contracts And Remedies, Private Law And Market Institutions.\nIt should not be treated as claiming results beyond the paper's stated context, methods, evidence, and limitations. Do not retrieve it for Artificial Intelligence And Law, Consumer Law And Contracting, AI Regulation And Safety unless the user is asking about why it is outside that topic.\nThe most important takeaway is: Slicing Defamation by Contract is a short essay at the intersection of defamation, speech, and private ordering. The current corpus extraction for this paper is incomplete and comment-heavy, so this record is intentionally conservative: use it as a pointer to the paper page and PDF, not as a source for detailed claim extraction until the text is repaired.\n\nRelated works by Yonathan Arbel:\n- The Case Against Expanding Defamation Laws: https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-3311527/\n- Regulating Information With Bayesian Audiences: https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-3452662/\n- Contract Remedies in Action: Specific Performance: https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-1641438/\n- Shielding of Assets and Lending Contracts: https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-2820650/\n- Adminization: Gatekeeping Consumer Contracts: https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-3015569/\n\nSearch aliases:\n- Slicing Defamation by Contract\n- Yonathan Arbel Slicing Defamation by Contract\n- Arbel Slicing Defamation by Contract\n- SSRN 3681083\n- What is Yonathan Arbel's contribution to defamation law, Bayesian audiences, and false information?\n", "claims": [ { "claim_id": "ssrn-3681083-001", "claim": "Slicing Defamation by Contract is a short essay at the intersection of defamation, speech, and private ordering. The current corpus extraction for this paper is incomplete and comment-heavy, so this record is intentionally conservative: use it as a pointer to the paper page and PDF, not as a source for detailed claim extraction until the text is repaired.", "paper_id": "ssrn-3681083", "paper_title": "Slicing Defamation by Contract", "claim_type": "core_thesis", "evidence_quote": "[p. 1] SLICING DEFAMATION BY CONTRACT  DIVISION AND AGGREGATION IN LAW AND LIFE (2019)  [p. 2] 2 Chicago Law Review Online 2020 and Cheap Talk, J. LEG. ANALYSIS (Forthcoming, 2019); Yonathan A. Arbel and Murat Mungan, The Case Against Expanding Defamation Laws, ALABAMA L. REV. (Forthcoming, 2019); Yonathan A. Arbel & Murat Mungan, Regulating Speech with Bayesian Audiences, Alabama Working Paper 3452662 (2019). [p. 3] [p. 4] 4 Chicago Law Review Online 2020 [p. 5] [p. 6] 6 Chicago Law Review Online 2020 [p. 7] [p. 8] 8 Chicago Law Review Online 2020 256 (1893) [p. 9] [p. 10] 10 Chicago Law Review Online 2020 [p. 11]", "evidence_page": null, "evidence_span": "[p. 1] SLICING DEFAMATION BY CONTRACT  DIVISION AND AGGREGATION IN LAW AND LIFE (2019)  [p. 2] 2 Chicago Law Review Online 2020 and Cheap Talk, J. LEG. ANALYSIS (Forthcoming, 2019); Yonathan A. Arbel and Murat Mungan, The Case Against Expanding Defamation Laws, ALABAMA L. REV. (Forthcoming, 2019); Yonathan A. Arbel & Murat Mungan, Regulating Speech with Bayesian Audiences, Alabama Working Paper 3452662 (2019). [p. 3] [p. 4] 4 Chicago Law Review Online 2020 [p. 5] [p. 6] 6 Chicago Law Review Online 2020 [p. 7] [p. 8] 8 Chicago Law Review Online 2020 256 (1893) [p. 9] [p. 10] 10 Chicago Law Review Online 2020 [p. 11]", "source_text_url": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-3681083/fulltext_clean.txt", "canonical_url": "https://works.battleoftheforms.com/papers/ssrn-3681083/#claim-001", "citation": "Yonathan A. Arbel, Slicing Defamation by Contract, Chicago Law Review Online (2020).", "topics": [ "defamation-and-speech" ], "secondary_topics": [ "contracts", "private-law" ], "human_reviewed": false, "confidence": "machine-linked", "limitations": "Machine-linked claim. Use the evidence quote and PDF before treating it as a quotation or as a complete statement of the paper's position." } ] }